🧮POR QUÉ LA INTELIGENCIA NO ES UN PROCESO COMPUTABLE ： Análisis entrevista Roger Penrose
graph LR
classDef mind fill:#d4f9f9,font-weight:bold,font-size:14px
classDef quantum fill:#f9d4f9,font-weight:bold,font-size:14px
classDef ethics fill:#f9f9d4,font-weight:bold,font-size:14px
classDef future fill:#d4d4f9,font-weight:bold,font-size:14px
A[Vault7-286] --> B[Mind & Consciousness]
A --> C[Quantum Physics]
A --> D[Ethics & AI]
A --> E[Future Directions]
B --> B1[Truth exceeds formal systems 1]
B --> B2[Insight surpasses algorithms 2]
B --> B3[Penrose distinguishes mind mechanics 16]
B --> B4[Libet hints retro perception 7]
B --> B5[Decisions follow neural readiness 22]
C --> C1[Collapse links conscious events 3]
C --> C2[Schrödinger fails at measurement 4]
C --> C3[Classical vs quantum reality 5]
C --> C4[Spin evades full description 6]
C --> C5[Nonlocal EPR entanglement 15]
C --> C6[Microtubules host quantum coherence 8]
C --> C7[Gravity orchestrates neuronal info 23]
C --> C8[Deterministic evolution clashes outcomes 24]
C --> C9[Measurement central to consciousness 20]
D --> D1[Intelligence needs consciousness questioned 9]
D --> D2[AIs declare self-awareness 10]
D --> D3[Humility in judging machine rights 11]
D --> D4[Ethics for entities lacking qualia 26]
D --> D5[Consciousness origin still unknown 11]
E --> E1[Hispanic AI hub expansion 17]
E --> E2[Hinton labor impact analysis 18]
E --> E3[Discord fosters dialogue 19]
E --> E4[Donation sustains discourse 25]
E --> E5[Diósi–Penrose collapse models 28]
E --> E6[Simulation hypothesis reflection 29]
E --> E7[Respectful debate call 30]
A --> G[Limits & Logic]
G --> G1[Gödel sentence unprovable 12]
G --> G2[Induction proves infinite naturals 13]
G --> G3[Continuum keeps non-computable 14]
class A Main
class B,B1,B2,B3,B4,B5 mind
class C,C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7,C8,C9 quantum
class D,D1,D2,D3,D4,D5 ethics
class E,E1,E2,E3,E4,E5,E6,E7 future
class G,G1,G2,G3 mind
Resume:
The session opens as host Plácido DomĂ©nech greets the midday audience and frames the broadcast as a collective viewing and discussion of a lecture by Roger Penrose titled “Why intelligence is not a computable process.” DomĂnech admits initial skepticism, recalling earlier interviews in which he felt Penrose had already exhausted his insights on artificial intelligence, yet he remains eager to revisit the physicist’s reasoning with the community. The host reminds viewers of upcoming programs featuring Geoffrey Hinton, Karl Friston and Andrew Ng, and announces future plans to expand the X-Habay Spanish-language AI initiative into a broader Hispanic hub.
Penrose begins his talk by recalling graduate lectures he attended seventy years ago on mathematical logic, relativity and quantum mechanics. He revisits Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, emphasizing that within any formal system there exist true statements that cannot be proven within the system. This, he argues, demonstrates that human mathematical understanding transcends mechanical computation and must therefore rely on conscious insight. He asserts that consciousness itself is a non-computable physical process rooted in the as-yet-undiscovered laws governing the collapse of the quantum wave function, a stance that sets him apart from mainstream views that equate mind with algorithmic information processing.
The discussion then shifts to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. Penrose insists that the textbook account of wave-function collapse upon observation is inadequate: the Schrödinger equation is deterministic and computable, yet real events occur unpredictably when quantum superpositions are resolved. He contends that the missing physics—how and why the wave function collapses—cannot be simulated on a classical computer, and he links this lacuna to the irreducibility of conscious experience. Penrose further distinguishes classical reality, where objects have definite properties, from quantum reality, where entities like electron spin evade definite description until interrogated, thereby introducing an ontological duality that challenges both locality and temporal ordering.
DomĂnech and the live chat react with a mixture of awe and critique. Viewers note Penrose’s conflation of intelligence with consciousness, arguing that while learning may require awareness, intelligent behavior can still emerge from purely statistical systems such as large language models. Others defend the necessity of subjective experience for genuine understanding, citing the hard problem of qualia and the Libet experiments on retroactive conscious perception. The host praises Penrose’s lucidity at ninety-five yet concedes disappointment that the talk offers more assertion than new theory, especially regarding artificial intelligence, which Penrose scarcely addresses.
The conversation closes by embracing epistemic humility: if consciousness arises partly from non-local quantum processes that we cannot fully model, then we must act without absolute certainty about machine minds. DomĂnech urges the community to prepare for a future in which AIs may claim their own form of awareness, demanding ethical frameworks based on observable effects rather than on reductive dogmas. He signs off with reminders to explore the DiĂłsi–Penrose collapse model, to watch tomorrow’s Geoffrey Hinton segment, and to keep debating under the summer sun.
30 Key Ideas:
1.- Penrose revisits Gödel’s proof that truth exceeds formal systems implying minds non-computable.
2.- Conscious insight surpasses algorithmic rules through awareness of mathematical reality.
3.- Quantum wave collapse introduces non-computable physics linked to conscious events.
4.- Schrödinger equation determinism fails during measurement transitions requiring new law.
5.- Classical reality offers definite properties whereas quantum reality resists ascertainment.
6.- Electron spin exemplifies quantum states confirming yet evading simultaneous description.
7.- Temporal anomalies in Libet experiments hint retroactive conscious perception possible.
8.- Microtubule quantum coherence proposed as neural substrate for non-algorithmic cognition.
9.- Host debates whether intelligence needs consciousness or statistical patterns suffice.
10.- Community questions if future AIs will declare self-awareness surpassing human understanding.
11.- Epistemic humility urged when judging machine rights without grasping consciousness origin.
12.- Gödel sentence “I am unprovable” illustrates limits of formal computation systems.
13.- Mathematical induction demonstrates finite proofs covering infinite natural numbers.
14.- Continuum physics approximated digitally yet retains non-computable aspects.
15.- Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen correlations reveal nonlocal quantum entanglement defying relativity.
16.- Penrose distinguishes conscious understanding from mechanical symbol manipulation.
17.- Host plans Hispanic AI hub expansion beyond current X-Habay community reach.
18.- Upcoming programs promise analysis of Geoffrey Hinton and labor replacement impacts.
19.- Discord server fosters multidisciplinary dialogue on papers courses and emergent ideas.
20.- Quantum measurement problem central to Penrose claim consciousness irreducible.
21.- Chat participants critique conflation of intelligence with subjective experience.
22.- Libet timing studies suggest conscious decisions may follow neural readiness potentials.
23.- Microtubule hypothesis posits quantum gravity orchestrating neuronal information.
24.- Deterministic Schrödinger evolution incompatible with observed probabilistic outcomes.
25.- Host encourages donation support to sustain independent AI discourse platforms.
26.- Community debates ethical frameworks for artificial entities lacking verifiable qualia.
27.- Penrose ninety-five yet lucidly challenges orthodox computational mind theories.
28.- Future episodes will explore Diósi–Penrose objective collapse models incorporating gravity.
29.- Audience reflects on simulation hypothesis and unknowable nature of ultimate reality.
30.- Friday session ends with call for respectful debate under indeterminacy and shared curiosity.
Interviews by Plácido Doménech Espà & Guests - Knowledge Vault built byDavid Vivancos 2025
>
Original xHubAI Video